Farmers Versus Big Business Water Politics


Lack of clarity over who should regulate and control water access causes competition between farmers, urban dwellers and foreign investment

The narrow Uluguru mountain paths in eastern Tanzania are crisscrossed by a spaghetti of hosepipes drawing water from the mountain rivers for the sprinklers on the terraced fields of Choma. Carrots, herbs, chillies, passion fruit, raspberries, strawberries and many other crops all grow here. Farmers say that the sprinklers – in place since 2004 – in combination with organic farming techniques, have helped them to invest in transport, send children to school, and improve their housing.

But in 2006 farmers were threatened with eviction from the mountain, accused of damaging the environment and threatening the viability of urban water supplies. They appealed to President Jakaya Kikwete and were allowed to stay – at least until the local government could find the resources to evict them – but their future is precarious; last year Kikwete called for the eviction of farmers from the Ulugurus, reversing his stance from six years earlier. The direction of the state is unclear, still wishing to be seen as both the champion of the peasantry and of foreign investment.

One of the main problems is that there is a fundamental lack of clarity over whose responsibility it is to regulate and control access to water in Tanzania. The Wami-Ruvu River Basin Office is one of nine river basin offices in the country. They are formally in charge of regulating how water is used, but such offices have little capacity to do more than register water users and sell them permits.

Legislation states that river basin offices should monitor and fine users who breach their usage allowance – they don’t – and assumes that associations of “water-users” will automatically resolve issues of conflict over water. In practice, there are no mechanisms to resolve competition for water between the Choma farmers and the urban users of Morogoro, or between the Dakawa scheme and upstream irrigators. As one employee of the Wami-Ruvu River Basin Office put it: “We just sell water”. This leaves a situation in which access to such a vital resource is determined by those who are currently best able to pay.

In all countries, dealing with agriculture taking place at different scales is a difficult one. Most governments in sub-Saharan Africa have worked on the assumption that as agriculture modernised, small-scale farmers would dwindle in number. In our opinion, agriculture policy has therefore tended to ignore the small scale in favour of larger and more commercial operations.

The politics of irrigation development in Tanzania sadly mirrors this: the favouring of large schemes that attract significant donor support, coupled with the problems of managing this at a local level. Unfortunately for farmers like those in Choma, it seems that no matter how significant the social or economic benefits of their less formal practices, the politics is likely to continue to lead to them being dismissed by those in authority.

The solutions to these problems are not easy and will require a strategic commitment to resolving the multiple and growing demands for water.

Source: The Guardian

Read More Related Content On This Topic - Click Here

Please feel free to submit your feedback below

Enter the characters shown in the image.